In 2005, the world watched as the G8 summit was held in Scotland and Bob Geldof cashed in on it with the Live 8 concerts.
In 2010, Canada is hosting the G20 summit.
So where did the other 12 come from?
June 28, 2010
June 21, 2010
Random Button
Earlier on, I was setting a video taping at work and the Sky+ box I have there was tuned to Discovery Science. On air at that moment was a programme about a building. Not overly interesting really apart from the fact that the university they were at was Plymouth UK (I’d imagine there is a Plymouth in the US and that there’s a university there…).
And the lift in this building had a button marked R which is for Random. So people can press this button and the lift will pick a floor at random to take them to. Apparantly, this is to get people to explore the building more than they would do.
So I started to think, what other places and things would benefit from a Random Button?
- MP3 or CD Players: OK, has already been done. And they do benefit from a Random Button.
- TV Remote Controls: Have you ever flicked through the TV channels and found something quite interesting on that you wouldn’t have found otherwise? Think about it…
- Internet: Browse the Internet by pressing a random button and see what happens.
- Sat Nav: Have a Random Button on a sat nav device, press it and see where it takes you. Hopefully it won’t drive you off a bridge or onto a railway. I think they’re getting better now though.
- Food: There’s a line in ‘dinnerladies’ where the main character Bren says that she takes the labels off her tins of food at home so she doesn’t know what she’ll have until she opens it. Perhaps Internet shopping sites should have a ‘random basket’ button which will just fill up your shopping basket with random items up to a certain amount.
Actually, this is harder than I thought. Any ideas?
* Footnote: As it happens, there were some other intresting quirks of this building – one of which was that it can create music based on how people pass through the building. I did actually tape the programme which I might watch at some point, maybe post the relevant bit here so you can see what I’m babbling on about…
March 29, 2010
The difference between men and women…
Yes, okay, that was a little bit of a heading to pull you in this time.
However, I was at Tesco in Tiverton on Friday, and on my way out remembered that I needed to get some cash out of the cash point so went there. Only one of the two machines was working, and the queue, all males, was standing in the usual place for queueing at these particular machines, despite the fact that it was raining rather heavily at the time, and that all of us in the queue except for the person at the machine itself (which is convienently located under a roof) were getting a bit wet. Nobody else joined the queue behind me, until I was at the machine itself (which, as I mentioned before was under cover) when this was when the women started to withdraw money. However, the women queued to the side of me, remaining under cover.
These are the two facts. The men queued in the correct place (there are footprints painted on the floor where Tesco want people to stand when they wait) but got wet, while the women queued in the incorrect place but remained (relatively) dry.
I looked at it this way: the men queued and were not worried that they were getting wet, while the women didn’t want to get wet.
How do you look at this?
August 23, 2009
The Rice and the Chessboard – how the Internet has ruined life for the better
There is a story about a Chinese man who invented the game of Chess. The Chinese emperor at the time said something like ‘what can I give you for your reward?’. The gentleman replied that on his chessboard, he would have one piece of rice on one square, two on the next, four on the next, eight on the next, sixteen on the next and so forth.
I was told this story by my Granddad this afternoon, with the question ‘how many grains of rice were there in total?’. Being the former IT student that I am, I recognised this as being binary – which to a certain extent it is. A square on the chessboard is equivalent to 1 bit, a line on a chessboard is 8 squares, therefore a line is equivalent to a byte and would have 128 grains of rice on the line.
This is where things started to go a bit awry in my mind. Not having any pieces of paper to work things out on, and realising that it wasn’t simply a case of having 8×128 (the ninth square would be 256), I figured that this was impossible for me to work out. Nevertheless, I started to think that I might be able to work it out once I returned home and had the computer in front of me.
8×8 is 64, thought I, therefore a chessboard is effectively 64 bit, and the answer would be that number, multiplied by itself, minus 1 (which in binary would be 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111)
Thinking that it would be easy to work out what the 64th number in the binary world would be, I did a quick Google search but gave up. (I have since worked this out, see below.)
That is when I started to write this blog post, thinking that I could allow you all to see me work through this mathematical problem. To give the story a proper retelling, I then searched Google for ‘rice chessboard’ or something like that. What should pop up high on the list, but an article from good old Wikipedia, which not only told me the story – the Chinese gentleman was in fact an ancient Indian mathmetitian named Sessa so -1 point for my grandfather there – but also the answer.
The answer is 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 – which when read out is eighteen million four hundred and forty six thousand seven hundred and forty four million seventy three million seven hundred and nine million five hundred and fifty one thousand six hundred and fifteen (I think anyway).
Now, having the answer to this conundrum has made me a much better person. Admittedly, I didn’t work it out myself (which actually would have made me a much better person) because I looked it up on the Internet. I was going to, but the Internet stopped me from doing it as it made it quite a pointless thing to do. The Internet has ruined my life. But it has made me a better person for it.
Possibly.
(To conclude, the 64th number in the ‘binary sequence’ is √(18446744073709551615 + 1) which is 4294967296. That bit was worked out by myself, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s wrong…)
April 24, 2009
Pay your PIN by PIN
Don’t worry, this isn’t going to be a rant about using PINs to pay for your items with credit cards (though while I’m at it, all the leaflets and stuff that were going round at the time that Morrisons changed said that using PINs were more secure – surely it is much easier to remember a four-digit number than it is to copy somebody’s signature… on the upside it means that I am able to use my mum’s card to do the shopping which, given that she’s pretty much housebound now, is a good thing!)
I was in a shop the other day and they were using a card terminal that wasn’t part of the till itself so they had to type in the amount I had bought.
And that lead me to think…
Has anybody ever bought something that is the value of their PIN?
For instance, if my PIN was 4253, and I bought something that was £42.53 then that would be a yes (remembering of course that when values are entered into tills and card units, it is always done by pence so that they would enter in 4253 and so would I).
(And, no, that isn’t my PIN, I’m not that stupid. I did consider double-bluffing you too as that is the sort of thing I would do, but even I have a line that I daren’t cross on the Internet, and publising my PIN is about 250 yards away from that line! As an aside, I used to, when I was with friends and getting money out of a cash machine, say four random digits as I entered my PIN just to confuse them. Of course, me being me ended up confusing myself on a number of occasions resulting in me not putting the number in correctly. But I digress.)
Of course, there are some problems with this theory. Depending if you’re rich or poor, or your PIN is a number in the low thousands or the high thousands. One of my PINs is quite a high number, and I think I’m quite unlikely to come across this situation myself with that card, while the other was what started me thinking as the amount I bought was rather close to my PIN. If you’re rich, with a high number, say 9835 then £98.35 is nothing to you and you’re quite likely to spend that, yet with a low number PIN (say, 1378) then £13.78 is such a low amount that you would probably just hand over a twenty pound note. On the other side, if you’re poor with a low number then £13.78 is, not a lot of money, but something you’d use a card for. £98.35 would probably be a weekly shop or something so something that would happen infrequently if at all.
I can honestly say that this has never happened to me. I just think these things up, honestly. I don’t know why or where but they do show up in my mind.
I shall let you know if it ever does happen to me, and I’d be quite interested to hear if it has happened to you – though I’d advise against publishing the actual amounts and therefore also your PIN!
June 20, 2007
The Incredible Games
For a very long time now, I have been asking a question of people I meet. The question is thus: Do you remember a kids game show where they were in a lift, and each floor was a different game. Pretty much everybody I ask remembers the show, but they, like me, cannot remember the name.
Except one person in the SABRE chat room this evening who told me that the show in question was called ‘The Incredible Games’.
It only ran for two series, and the computer in the first was David Walliams, who of course went on to do Little Britain. It was a great show – why didn’t they do more!